Climate Pledge

*The Climate Pledge is now being hosted by Redwood Coalition for Climate and Environmental Responsibility (RCCER). Elected officials and candidates for local offices can sign the current pledge through the website here.

Pledge to be a Climate Champion

We have asked the candidates for local offices to pledge to become climate champions if elected. They would pledge to promote strategies to reduce greenhouse gases that also support equitable economic opportunities.

Here is the full text of the pledge, with links to detailed information.

If you are a candidate who supports this pledge, please let us know at [email protected]. We’ll add your name, and post it here.

And if you email us a photo of you holding it, we’ll post that, too. Here’s a printable summary of the pledge: Climate Pledge for Printing.

If you are a voter in the upcoming Fall 2020 election here are the local candidates who have taken the pledge. Be sure to support them when it comes time to vote.

*If you are a candidate who supports this pledge, please let us know at [email protected]. We’ll add your name, and post it here.

And if you email us a photo of you holding it, we’ll post that, too. Here’s a printable summary of the pledge: Climate Pledge for Printing.

The following candidates for the November 3, 2020 election have signed the Climate Pledge.
If you are a voter, support them when it comes time to vote!

Scott Bauer, Eureka City Council Ward 4
Liza Welsh, Eureka City Council Ward 4
Eddie Morgan, Eureka City Council Ward 4
Kimberley White, Arcata City Council
Camilla Zapata, Arcata City Council
Collin Yeo, Arcata City Council
Oryan Peterson-Jones, Arcata City Council
Paul Pitino, Arcata City Council
Michael Winkler, Arcata City Council
Stacy Atkins-Salazar, Arcata City Council

Emily Grace Goldstein, Arcata City Council

Sarah Schaefer, Arcata City Council



Last Earth Day, April 22, 2020 and the following three days we asked people to join the national campaign to Stop the Money Pipeline — the flow of cash from banks and capital firms to fossil fuel developers.

Just since the Paris Climate Accords in 2015, big banks have invested $1.9 trillion in fossil fuels. To get involved with Stop the Money Pipeline campaign click here.

Many of those banks are familiar names locally. Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi (sponsor of Costco’s popular credit card). You may have insurance through Liberty Mutual, or a credit card through Bank of America (they’ve given $106 billion in credit to fossil fuel companies).

And if you’re personally able to invest, you may be doing so through Blackrock, which oversees huge investments in fossil fuels and deforestation projects — even as renewable energy outpaces fossil fuels in profit — see this article

Some local Stop the Money Pipeline actions are below. Here are a few ways you can join:

Post a review of these companies on a review website.

You don’t need to be a customer to have an opinion on their destructive practices. Are we getting a good deal if we suffer climate disaster?

Here are some review sites:

Afterward, let the company know why you gave them the review you did.

Write a letter to the editor

Local newspapers want to hear from you — so share your thoughts. You may want to review their letter guidelines, which you’ll find at the web addresses in parentheses.

Times-Standard (

930 Sixth Street

Eureka, CA 95501

email to: [email protected]

North Coast Journal (

310 F St.,

Eureka CA 95501

email to: [email protected]

Mad River Union (

No hard copy accepted. Email letters to: [email protected].

Commit to moving your account if your institution doesn’t stop funding
 fossil fuels

Do you have an account with any of the companies? If so, please consider writing a letter asking them to divest from fossil fuels. Commit to changing to a different institution if they don’t. You can post your letter on social media after sending it to your bank or other firm. If you have already moved your account, cut up your old bank or credit card on video and post it to YouTube or Facebook.


Support #YesonSB467

Fracking and harmful drilling exacerbate the climate crisis and environmental racism. Low-income communities and Black, Indigenous, and Latinx communities are disproportionately impacted by neighborhood drilling and toxic pollution. In addition, these dangerous methods can lead to earthquakes, increased droughts, groundwater contamination, and oil spills.

To move our state and the nation away from our dangerous reliance on fossil fuels and build towards a Just Recovery, we need thousands of Californians, like you, to ask your state senator to support SB 467 to protect the health of frontline communities and fight for climate justice.

Nearly 80% of Californians support a 2,500-foot human health buffer zone for oil operations, and 74% of Californians agree that elected officials should take immediate action to protect their constituents from the health impacts associated with oil production.

Mandated buffer zones are common in other oil-producing states, including Colorado, North Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. New York, Washington, and Maryland already banned fracking. It’s time for California to do the same.



Solar Project in Blue Lake

You can still comment and then speak to the Planning Commission in support of the Hatchery Road Solar Project.

The project has been moved to the 4/1 PC hearing. The staff report and agenda with links to the Zoom meeting will be available the Friday before the meeting at

Comments will be accepted up to the day of the hearing. Send to . [email protected] or send snail mail to: the Humboldt County Department of Planning and Building, 3015 H Street, Eureka, CA, 95501.

Below is a project description from the Planning Department’s environmental review document. [Available at: ]

The project description is followed by a number of talking points, some of which you may want to include in your letter. Thanks to Mary Sanger for compiling these.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project will include a small-scale commercial energy generating facility that would construct a 4 megawatt (MW) solar facility on approximately 25.70 acres. The proposed project includes approximately of 13,664 solar photovoltaic (PV) module arrays, 32 string inverters, and associated electrical conductors and equipment needed to convert sun energy into usable AC power. The project will enhance electrical reliability for the existing Pacific Gas & Electric’s (PG&E’s) grid system. A small drainage though the middle of the property will be avoided by a 150’ setback leaving the remainder of the land area covered by the solar arrays, which will be mounted on a racking system attached to steel piles driven into the ground. Single axis tracking technology will be utilized to allow the modules to efficiently track the sun throughout the day and maximize the efficiency of solar collection. The project proposes ongoing agricultural uses on the property, including but not limited to sheep grazing or the keeping of honey bees, on a rotational basis whereby pasture areas would be occupied for variable periods, allowing pasture rest periods to promote optimal vegetation quality management and maintenance of the project’s pollinator habitat.


  1. We appreciate that Humboldt County is taking the climate crisis seriously.  It is a threat that is global but the solutions often come down to local decisions  like promoting renewable energy installations.
  2. This project will reduce our dependence on the natural gas fired power plant on Humboldt Bay, reducing the county’s greenhouse gas emissions. The power the project provides will help mitigate the fact that Humboldt County peak power utilization exceeds the capacity of the transmission lines into the County.
  3.   It will be a move in the right direction to enable the county to achieve the 100% renewable electricity by 2025 that they have committed to. If approved, the project can be operational by July of this year!
  4. The general plan designation for the parcels  is agricultural and it specifies that renewable electricity installations are allowed. The property will not be converted out of agricultural.   The proposal to use the property for bee habitat and or grazing have been used  successfully at other solar installations around the world. The Planning Department document (link above) evaluates use of agricultural land for solar in great detail. The decision to approve this project is clearly based on significant and careful consideration. It should be noted that the underlying land, soil condition, or land use are not changed permanently, as they might be with other land use.  
  5. Most of the jobs in this project are in the construction phase.  It would be an economic benefit to the County if those jobs would go to local, living wage contractors.
  6. Some comments have suggested aesthetics is a problem. But aesthetics are time-bound and culturally specific. As the Planning Department document says: “Viewer response may be negative for viewers who place a high value on open space, or positive for viewers who place a high value on renewable energy. The limited expanse of the project feature and the limited importance of the affected viewpoints result in the impacts being less than significant.”
  7. Under CEQA, possible impacts are significant or not. This project has very few significant impacts and the County agrees that all of them can be mitigated to insignificance. As the Planning Department document summarizes: “The project will not degrade the quality of the environmental, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Although no special status species were observed on the project site, potential biological impacts related to special status bird species would be reduced to less than significant levels… In the event archaeological artifacts are found [mitigation measures] would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels… Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant with mitigation incorporated.“
  8. We suggest to the developers that they consider offering a community benefit. For example, the community wants to put in a trail from downtown Blue Lake out to the hatchery and a financial contribution could make that a reality.


Tell the California Senate to Protect Communities and Support AB345

It’s time for California to stop drilling for fossil fuels at the expense of public health.

Right now, there’s a bill that just passed the State Assembly and is under consideration in the Senate that would protect Californians from the hazards of oil and gas drilling.

AB 345 would require the agency that regulates oil drilling to consider a setback for oil and gas operations to protect people who live, play, work, or go to school nearby – primarily communities of color.

Will you send a message to the nine state senators on the Natural Resources & Water Committee right now urging them to vote YES on AB 345 so we have the strongest chance possible of getting it passed?


Click Here to Sign

AB 345 is scheduled for a hearing in the Natural Resources and Water Committee this month, perhaps as early as July 16. That’s why we need to get signatures and comments into the committee TODAY. If the bill passes this committee, it will move on to Appropriations Committee and then a full vote on the Senate floor.

More than 5 million Californians live near oil and gas drilling sites where toxic, health-threatening air pollutants are emitted. We know that proximity to oil and gas wells cause a host of health impacts including asthma and other respiratory ailments. Now, new research shows that those who live in heavily polluted areas have a higher risk of severe complications from COVID-19.

The oil industry is fighting to stop this bill, but we have a strong chance to get it through if you contact these key nine state senators. Click here to send a message and urge a YES vote on AB 345.

With thanks,

Local 350 groups of California


Transition to a Fossil Free world

350 Humboldt supports’s recent rebranding of clean energy and Keep it in the Ground initiatives under the #FossilFree banner.

Check it out: Fossil Free at!!


Local Clean Energy Resolutions

350 Humboldt’s first campaign began in 2018 when we drafted a resolution to support 100% Clean and Renewable electrical energy by 2025 ( Link to resolution). We were inspired by other communities throughout the US who stepped forward with similar resolutions in support of the goal of the Paris Climate Accords to keep global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius in order to avert climate catastrophe.

350 Humboldt presented our resolution to local city councils, lobbied council members, wrote letters and, most importantly, showed up to advocate for its adoption. We learned a lot about working with allies, and built networks of communication throughout our community.  One by one, the Eureka City Council (May 2018), McKinleyville Community Services District (June 2018) and Arcata City Council (July 2018) adopted the resolution. Once local jurisdictions were on board, we asked the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors to adopt our resolution, and they did in September of 2018.

The final goal, and the most significant challenge in our campaign, was to have the Redwood Coast Energy Authority adopt our resolution, as they are responsible for  Humboldt County’s Community Choice Energy program. We mobilized a strong show of support from the community to come to the meetings. To our great joy and relief, RCEA adopted the resolution unanimously!

We are really proud of the success of this campaign. It proved to us that Humboldt County citizens are willing to do the hard work necessary to influence policies that help in the fight against global climate change. Thanks to everyone who participated!